Friday, March 10, 2006

AB 3048 Dymally [SUPPORT] IHSS Pay for Dr's Appt

AB 3048 (Dymally) is sponsored by the California Association of Public
Authorities and co-sponsored by SEIU and UDW. This bill allows IHSS workers
to be paid for accompanying their consumers on medical appointments. We
hope you will be able to support this important measure and write a letter
in support. AB 3048 will be heard in the Assembly Human Services Committee
on April 25th and a sample letter in support is attached along with the text
of the bill. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you need any
additional information. We look forward to working with you on this and
other IHSS legislation that could improve this vital program.



Karen Keeslar
CAPA Legislative Advocate
(916) 448-5049
keeslar@sbcglobal.net

Link

AB 2120 Liu [OPPOSE] Expand Certifiers for Handicapped Placards

AB 2120, as introduced, Liu Vehicles: disabled persons: disabled
veterans: parking placards.
Existing law authorizes the Department of Motor Vehicles to issue
distinguishing placards to disabled persons or disabled veterans, to
be used for parking purposes, as described. Prior to issuing the
parking placard, the Department of Motor Vehicles requires the
submission of a certificate, signed by an authorized health care
professional, providing a full description substantiating the
applicant's disability, unless the disability is readily observable
and uncontested. Under existing law, the authorized health care
professional that signs the certificate is required to retain
information sufficient to substantiate the certificate, and make the
information available to certain entities, upon request of the
department.
This bill would expand the health care professionals authorized to
sign the certificate substantiating the applicant's disability to
include nurse practitioners, certified nurse midwives, and physician
assistants.

MINORITY OPINION to SUPPORT
I proffer my support for this bill.

One issue to be considered carefully is how Health
Mangling (read Managment) Organizations have relied
more and more heavily on the allied health care
professional to provide comprehensive medical care.
D.O. (Osteopathic Doctor i.e. Chiropractor and the
like), C.N.M. (Certified Nurse Midwife), C.N.P
(Certified Nurse Practioner), and P.A. (Physicians
Assistant) personnel have undergone extensive academic
and clinical training and are assuming more and more
of a primary care role within the "modern" health care
delivery model.

My husband received his care from a P.A. who is now in
charge of the urgent care department of a
multi-specialty, multi-location medical group and I
have received gynecologic care from a C.N.P. There
are legitimate medical conditions that women are
diagnosed with everyday that can fall into the
category of an impairment, temporary more likely than
permanent that a C.N.P or C.N.M. will diagnose and
treat as well as refer to other appropriate
specialties if necessary. A P.A. is qualified and
licensed to provide medical care including surgery.
Medicare, Medi-Cal and all of the private HMO's are
requiring assignment to allied health care
professionals all in the name of cost cutting. That
is not to say that any medical care provider is better
than another, more approachable, more appropriate than
another, more competent than another but if a person
requires a placard application completed and they do
not see an M.D, how are they supposed to accomplish
this?

I envision the need to make a consultation appointment
with an M.D whose office cannot set an appointment for
3 months and it will take up to 1 month just to get
their medical documentation to that M.D. who will then
need another 2 weeks to read through it and make a
determination of necessity when their regular
practioner who knows them and their medical
condition(s) like a book can do this in one visit.

Although I fully recognize and totally agree that the
medical determinations of pediatricians are suspect
for authorizing a placard for a 21 year old person who
was their patient until their 18th birthday just
because they whined a little to get a placard to avoid
paying exorbatant parking fees at college is but one
example of a system that has been demonstrated to be
corrupt and has demonstrated real and serious cases of
abuse.

But we must remember the changing face of medical
health care delivery systems and that the D.O, P.A,
C.N.M, and other allied health care professionals have
assumed a front and center role. This bill expands
their ability to provide their patient with disAbility
the public services they require by being allowed to
complete and authorize a parking placard. Following
the UCLA scandal, there were additional enforceable
provisions
of protection against the rempant abuses we saw. I do
not believe this bill, in any way, tampers with
existing law.

Ruthee Goldkorn

Link

Sunday, March 05, 2006

AB 2278 Koretz ID for Assistive Animal [CDR OPPOSES]

AB 2278, as amended, Koretz Assistive animals.
Existing law authorizes disabled persons to full and equal access
to facilities and accommodations, as specified. Existing law also
authorizes those persons to be accompanied by service dogs, as
specified.
This law would require the state State and
Consumer Services Agency to designate a lead agency to be
responsible for creating and producing an Assistive Animal Identification Card, which would entitle the service assistive animal
who is identified on the card to accompany the disabled person to the
extent provided under existing law.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: no.
CDR OPPOSES Federal Law and the DOJ regulations do not allow ID's to be required before a PWD enters a public accomodation. State ID's can only be utilized when an enhanced level of access beyond the minimum federal requirements are provided by the state as a result of that ID. Federal law does not allow fees to be charged for basic access to programs and services.

Link

Wednesday, March 01, 2006

AB651 Berg Assisted Suicide - CDR OPPOSES

AB651 Berg Assisted Suicide
[see also AB654]Two bills to legalize physician-assisted suicide are stalled but remain alive. As of this writing, AB 654 (Berg-Levine) is on the Assembly Inactive File[now dead], and its gutted-and-amended clone, AB 651 (Berg-Levine) is in the California Senate, where it has been referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee but not scheduled for a hearing. Both bills have missed deadlines for moving forward this year, but they are *not* dead. The authors are speaking out via the press an trying to neutralize the opposition. Opposition from the disability community, including groups like CDR, has been critically important in preventing passage of this dangerous legislation so far. We need to make sure the authors' arguments don't go unchallenged. Many expect that even if the bill fails in the Legislature, supporters will keep trying, possibly as a ballot measure. So the battle over this issue will continue.

CDR OPPOSES

Link

SB840 Kuehl Single Payer Health Insurance - CDR SUPPORTS!!!

Universal -Single payer- Health Coverage

CDR SUPPORTS

Link

AB1643 JonesState employees LTC [CDR SUPPORTS]

AB1643 JonesState employees LTC
Coverage for disabled in state service. A feasibility study to cover employees with disabilities - currently not eligible for LTC insurance.

CDR SUPPORTS

UPDATE!! Hearing Cancelled at request of author 8-16-05

Link